KOM News & Announcements

Lease Guaranties, Security Interests & Letters of Credit:
Tuesday, September 27th, 2011
Your retail tenant has filed for bankruptcy – now what?
Tuesday, September 27th, 2011
Regulations For ADA Amendments Act Take Effect in May 2011
Wednesday, May 18th, 2011
Not-So-High Times in Michigan
Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010
Reasonableness and Good Faith? It Is Not The Law
Wednesday, July 28th, 2010
New Federal Law Requires Employers to Provide Breaks to Nursing Employees
Monday, May 24th, 2010
EEOC Seeks to Clarify Employer Defense to Age Discrimination Claims
Monday, March 15th, 2010
Michigan and Delaware Limited Liability Company Acts – A Comparison
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Unique Issues Relating to Case Evaluation in Formal Condemnation Cases
Monday, December 7th, 2009
The Use of Mediation For Resolving Salary Disputes In Sports
Monday, December 7th, 2009
The DestiNY USA Litigation: Government’s Right to Extinguish Contract Terms Through Eminent Domain, Potentially Without Just Compensation
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Technical Requirements Governing Real Estate Appraisers
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Evaluating The Highest And Best Use Of Real Estate In Condemnation Cases
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Michigan Court of Appeals Clarifies Written Notice Requirement For Disability Accommodation
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Notice Of Employers FMLA Leave Calculation Method Must Be Provided To Employees
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Revised Court Rules Impact Companies’ Electronic Information
Monday, December 7th, 2009
An Electoral Uprising Dramatically Increases Property Owner Rights in Condemnation Cases.
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Controversial Regulations Regarding No-Match Letters Put On Hold
Monday, December 7th, 2009
Family and Medical Leave Act Expanded to Protect Military Families
Monday, December 7th, 2009
New Federal Law Protects Employees’ Genetic Information
Monday, December 7th, 2009

KOM Obtains Dismissal For Client In No-Fault Matter

Thursday, March 24th, 2011 at 10:24 AM

After thorough research and analysis of insurer priority under the Michigan No-Fault Act, Douglas M. Chapman recently obtained a dismissal for Kupelian Ormond & Magy, P.C.’s insurance carrier client in a Michigan No-Fault Act matter.  KOM’s client was sued, along with multiple other insurance carriers, by a claimant seeking Michigan No-Fault Act benefits from all carriers.  Mr. Chapman convinced all parties that his client was excess of all other carriers involved in the litigation.  The parties dismissed KOM’s client from the litigation.  Mr. Chapman represents insurance carrier clients in insurance coverage litigation and other related matters.